In BIQ, there is an entry in RSLOGSYSMAP for BIDCLNT100 -> BIQCLNT100.
If I am understanding you correctly, you're saying that this same mapping must be maintained in BID as well? If that is true, then what (if anything) would this mess up if our BID system routes in STMS are designed to go into two systems?
BID (development) -> BIQ (quantity) -> BIP (production)
BID (development) -> BIS (staging)
I would then assume we'd need to have BIDCLNT100->BIQCLNT100 and BIDCLNT100->BISCLNT100?